KNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Knife River Corp.'s net margin of --. Knife River Corp.'s return on equity of 10.34% beat Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Knife River Corp. has a consensus price target of $98.60, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Knife River Corp. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Knife River Corp. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Knife River Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.266%.

Knife River Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Knife River Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Knife River Corp. quarterly revenues are $755.1M, which are larger than Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Knife River Corp.'s net income of $32M is higher than Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Knife River Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.14x while Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knife River Corp. is 1.70x versus 0.46x for Blue Star Opportunities Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Knife River Corp.'s net margin of 1.68%. Knife River Corp.'s return on equity of 10.34% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Knife River Corp. has a consensus price target of $98.60, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Knife River Corp., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Knife River Corp..

Knife River Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Knife River Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Knife River Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Knife River Corp. quarterly revenues are $755.1M, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Knife River Corp.'s net income of $32M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Knife River Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.14x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 61.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knife River Corp. is 1.70x versus 1.89x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Knife River Corp.'s net margin of 8.36%. Knife River Corp.'s return on equity of 10.34% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61%.

Knife River Corp. has a consensus price target of $98.60, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $80.30 which suggests that it could grow by 1.36%. Given that Knife River Corp. has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals Co., analysts believe Knife River Corp. is more attractive than Commercial Metals Co..

Knife River Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.05%.

Knife River Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Knife River Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Knife River Corp. quarterly revenues are $755.1M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Knife River Corp.'s net income of $32M is lower than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M. Notably, Knife River Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.14x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 20.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knife River Corp. is 1.70x versus 1.12x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Knife River Corp.'s net margin of 4.68%. Knife River Corp.'s return on equity of 10.34% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Knife River Corp. has a consensus price target of $98.60, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $119.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.35%. Given that Knife River Corp. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Knife River Corp. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Knife River Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Knife River Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Knife River Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Knife River Corp. quarterly revenues are $755.1M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Knife River Corp.'s net income of $32M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Knife River Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.14x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knife River Corp. is 1.70x versus 0.72x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.